Saturday, September 22, 2012

Week 8: Disciuss how you could use STANSW Young Scientist Awards or a similar award system (eg; CREST or BHP Awards) to assist teachers and students with open ended investigations and apply holistic marking criteria

Module Focus: 9.7 Genetics: The code broken?

It is my experience that doing open ended investigations with Preliminary and HSC students can be quite difficult. This is quite the opposite from what I saw with yr 6 students during the MyScience program. I think there are 3 key elements that separate the behaviours and attitudes of primary and secondary students - engagment, stress, and rewards. The primary students had a topic that was deliberately chosen to engage them, there was little to no stress placed on the outcome of the investigation, and there was a reward system in place that rewarded achievement with things that they found valuable. Secondary schooling open-ended investigations usually consist of whatever topic is in the syllabus and then refined to some syllabus dot points, set around all the hurly burly of HSC work and the stress surrounding high marks, and rewarded with nothing more than a mark. So there is little wonder that secondary student's don't like them.

Awards systems such as the STANSW Young Scientist awards give students (and teachers) a framework that engages students with giving them choice and scope to pursue their interests, reduces stress by having no bearing on their HSC (but the teacher can change that by incorporating it as an assessment), and having cash prizes, and all kids like money.

Relating this to the genetics module of HSC Biology, there is plenty of room to see how far students can go. There are so many dot points that begin with "process (and analyse) information from secondary sources ........" to get students started. The easy way out would be for a teacher to pick a point and ask students to do an assessment on it instead of teaching it. However I would use the topic to model investigations (so students know what to do) and then towards the end of the module let students pick their own dot point to base some further investigation of their own ideas from. This creates the engagment, and stress can be reduced by limiting the importance of it as an assessment.

These awards systems also are a great introduction into holistic marking for students and teachers. This is a good introduction for students to come to terms with the idea of getting marks for understanding and not writing chunks of information. Teachers also get experience with this marking scheme and how if promotes understading rather than memory skills.

The analytical v holistic marking debate is very interesting. There's debate about it in all types on mediums and forums. I found it quite interesting. Check out here, here, and here to get started.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Week 7: Assess one useful website that you would use for a practical activity for your syllabus point

Module Focus: 9.6 Biotechnology
The Year 12 option module of Biotechnology has lots of great opportunities for practical work. One area at the beginning of the module is syllabus point 9.6.3.3.1, which is; 

Gather and process information from secondary sources to:
–   identify and describe a named industrial fermentation process
–   identify the micro-organism used in the fermentation and the products of the fermentation
–   outline the use of the product of the fermentation process
    –   use available evidence to assess the impact of the use of the fermentation product on society at the time of its introduction.

As with most things today, the first step for students (and teachers) is a google search. Students routinely just look at the first sites that pop up from their search and use that content. With that rationale in mind, I have chosen to assess the first non-sponsored and non-wikipedia (because wikipedia came up first) website google returns when I search the phrase "what is the fermentation process". This site was "What is fermentation" found at: http://chemistry.about.com/od/lecturenoteslab1/f/What-Is-Fermentation.htm

The first question to be asked is "Is the content credible?" After reading I think it is. It is all correct and the source site being labelled as a part of the New York Times gives it added weight. The next issue is "Is the information at the appropriate level for the students?" Again, the site passes my judgement on this. There is a few sections where the content is quite detailed, but it is never far beyond the comprehension of students. Finally, "Is the content appropriate for the syllabus point?" I believe it is, but just barely. The site only contains enough information to be considered a 'starting point' for research deeper into the content, but what saves it is the use of links to other sites to elaborate on the important relevant content. 

In conclusion, This sight has relevant, appropriate, and credible information for this syllabus dot point. I did not make mention of the issue of surrounding the quality of this resource as a learning tool, or its ability to foster learning, because that is the job of the teacher and any resource can develop deep learning in students if the teacher uses it the right way (well that's my view anyway). 

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Week 6: Assess one useful web site that you would use for a practical activity for your syllabus point

Module Focus: 9.5 Communication

A great place to get online resources for HSC science topics is the UniServe Science resource sight developed by the University of Sydney. The Stage 6 Biology site is split into resources for each module as well as other information on the whole Syllabus. The page dedicated to the communication module has over 50 online resources to use. 

From this collection I found the Comparative Mammalian Brain Collections site to be very interesting and educational. It is a well mapped site out site with lots of separate, well spaced and formatted pages with clear, concise information and clear, colourful, and interactive diagrams. All this makes the information easy for students to process and engage with, and the content being well formatted rather than cluttered or all crammed together helps too. The negatives of this site is that it does not cover an explicit syllabus point. It can also get a bit awkward navigating through all the pages if students are unsure of exactly what they are looking for. 

All in all, I think it's a really good site and would incorporate it when with higher ability classes that can handle 'deeper', more expansive work and use their critical thinking to link the different ideas already covered in the communication topic. I don't think I would use it for average ability classes where the focus is just to get the syllabus content covered.





Saturday, September 1, 2012

Week 5: Describe one assessment tool you would use in the Biology classroom - examples of good practice

Module Focus: 9.4 The search for better health

There are many opportunities to use assessment tools in module 9.4. The first assessment tool I would be a diagnostic assessment, that I would conduct at the beginning of the module. This could be be in a number of forms; written quiz, multiple choice, matching pairs, gameshow style quiz, 3 mins to write everything they know about a topic. The form I gave would be dependant upon the ability and engagement level of the class. I would ask students questions regarding the major body systems, definition of disease, how the body repairs damage, and some examples of diseases and repair mechanisms.

This task would serve a dual purpose. I as the teacher would be able to identify what previous knowledge students can recall and to what level of detail. For the students, it shows them what current knowledge they have will be resurfacing throughout the topic that they should be aware of. From a learning perspective it's really important to 'dredge up' this prior knowledge and it's schema in students minds. It's much easier for students to learn the new material if they can build new knowledge structures off of their previous knowledge base (schema).

There is lots of good information out there about diagnostic assessment. Leighton & Gierl's book is quite interesting, as is this Huff & Goodman article. There is also lots of easily accessible information on youtube, such as this overview of assessment by Hope in Schools.

Week 4: Describe one learning cycle activity you would use in a Biology lesson. Give reasons why you would choose this for your particular syllabus point

Module Focus: 9.3 Blueprint of life

Coming soon ... I'm working on it